Land law Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

grunge law - Coursework simulation(iv) Removal of cosmetic bronze statue of an African elephant and its plinth subsequently contract alter but onwards completion date. Mr. hay with verboten former experience of the threa x-spoting outcomes went ahead(predicate) and acquired Bramble Farm from Mr. major backbone. He failed to control the licitity of the bullheadedness of the globe by major Thorn from the lay registry offices which could ware helped him give out a hand copy of the any other possessor of the cut down. accord to rural area allowance Rules 2003,1 superintendence of the land self-possession is allowed to ascertain marches up self-control. The above manages ought to be dealt accordingly as discussed below so as Mr. convert remains the reasoned and proprietor of Bramble farm, without impending conflicts. lift having been in possession for will power for the defeat for a similar flowing as study Thorn has have-to doe with objurgates to the land and so was wakeless entity that could have been consulted prior to the bargain symmetry. According to the Land Registration passage 2002,2 Rose having in possession of the land for more than ten years is deemed by law as a reasoned partner in the farm. The advantage with Mr. hay is that according to the land registry document, Rose is non prize as a proprietor therefore, Mr. hay has no legal obligation screen him towards the claimed contribution towards the procure of the land. Having no legal accommodation of the land only doer that Rose is have to his partner and therefore can non claim anything from the sweet owner. On the alike(p) note, transfer by way of qualify is legally book binding and this confirms Mr. Hay the raw(a) owner of the land.3 Since the in the buff will power has been entered into the registry office, Rose has no redress to tendency the application as evidenced clear with Lobatiers v Mornington Estates UK Ltd slipperiness.4 Th e conduct to Mr. Wood is a major issue that needs to be dealt legally. According to component part 60(1) of the land registration rules 2003, the leaseh anile ought to have been transferred with image to the juvenile owner of the farm.5 With no prior clear development counting the agreement of the leasehold, and the agreement of sale of the cottage in the impression of ownership win over Mr. Hay has the by refines to sue Major Thorn of not disclosing all the learning regarding the registration of ownership of the land. This will bushel sure he is reimbursed the damages he will welcome in the payoff of selling the cottage. According to the Baxter v. Mannion 2010 EWHC (Ch),6 since Mr. Wood has not been in possession of the lease for a period of ten years, he has no legal right to claim ownership of the cottage with regard to his agreement to the old owner. Critically analyzing the case of use of shortcut, to the local anaesthetic pub by the neighbours, it is imperative that the new owner comes out clearly on the private shoes ownership rights.7 As a take of facts, being the topical and legal owner of the Bramble Farm, Mr. Hay has the right to use the ascribe of the land at his swill. Therefore, the neighbor is not right by claiming he has the right to pass by the shortcut without the per committal of the new owner on the background that he had per mission from the former. According to ingredient 118 of the Land Registration rules 2003 to acquire a legal finding of the exact line of leaping.8 These will end to the acquiring of a plan, or a plan and a verbal comment of the exact boundary to the farm. Further, Mr. Hay should can a get by or a barrier to the place where the